All ideas

We unfortunately experience that some do not purchase their SSL certificates but issue them on their own. This means that we cannot establish an HTTPS connection to them as it is embedded in the base image which root CAs we trust. Therefore, there...

I think we should integrate our compare tool into tracking search. Being able to select two files, press compare, and choose a step to compare. I have seen a lot of scenarios where a file fails and we want to compare it to a file that does not fai...

We are experiencing this error when sending EDIFACT Sales Reports to Link. Bizbrains.Link.Base.Exceptions.LinkException: An unexpected error has occurred while disassembling the message. ---> Bizbrains.Edifact.EdifactException: Segment w...

I have observed that if you open any of document type classifier which is having value for document config in and click on save – that removes value for document config in..

SourceFilename/ReceivedFilename available as macro for MailSubject og Mail body for stakeholder mails

Sometimes, partners need varying values in their UNB segments. It should be possible to overwrite the UNB fields for EDIFACT documents. This should be applied on distribution level. Another option could be that a partner has the possibility to hav...

It would be nice to have the possibility of performing advanced validation of messages. Sometimes schema-validation isn't quite enough. Ideas: Schematron vadiation Rule based (conditional) formatting setup

A password (on an SFTP location) is truncated from and to an eventual '<'.

The text does not specify that these additional files are for the http response. This labling would be more clear: On the HTTP transport detail page, the labels should be changed as follows: Save headers as additional file -> Save response head...

Some times Partners have a lot of Identifications, especially for internal partners.It would be nice to be able to add a description field. The field should be called "Notes" (not description). The field should not be required.